Xcel community solar turns two

As the market potential and popularity of community solar grows nationally, all eyes are on Minnesota and Xcel Energy’s Solar*Rewards Community program. Why are so few projects up and running? How real is the 800MW queue? Is the program durable? At the two year anniversary of Xcel Energy’s community solar program launch, we’re taking a deep dive on the health of the program today and its potential going forward.

First, the good: in the two years since Xcel launched its community solar program in Minnesota over 2,000 garden applications have been submitted. The bad? Only 4 applications, totaling 400kW, are interconnected and producing power today.

At this time last year stakeholders felt cautiously optimistic. The initial, arguably unexpected, cohort of applications which had created a bottleneck within Xcel’s administrative and engineering staff seemed to be unstuck and moving forward. Additionally, after disagreement and controversy over project co-location, in June 2015 the Public Utilities Commission came to a decision to cap existing co-located projects at 5MW and temporarily limit new applications to 1MW.

One year ago, with uncertainty about whether or not the 30 percent federal tax credit would be renewed, stakeholders were ready to forget the bumpy program launch and focus on expediency through the final interconnection stages. Xcel was seemingly on board, predicting that they would approve projects “north of 250 MWs” by the end of 2016.

But, as we near the end of 2016, Xcel is now predicting a fraction of that number – 55 MW – will be energized by year’s end. According to Xcel’s latest compliance report filed this week:

To date, several delays have prevented previously scheduled in-service dates from occurring, including safety concerns due to insufficient grounding, solar garden readiness, solar-garden equipment failures during testing and other unspecified requests to move dates. Xcel is working to accommodate shifting schedules whenever possible for year-end completion, but timelines and crew availability is very tight at this time of year, and weather-related impacts are possible.

What is the status of the 800 MW application queue?

Today’s interconnection queue is primarily comprised of applications submitted well over 1 year ago, the majority of which are co-located gardens between 1 and 5 MW in size. The chart below shows the monthly progression of these applications over the last calendar year from the Early Application Stage (blue), through the Engineering Study Stage (red), into the Design & Construction Stage (green) and finally to a complete application and in service project (sliver of purple).

The first trend this chart shows is that projects are moving through the process, albeit slowly. Xcel’s latest compliance filing reports 178 MW across 49 project sites in the “construction phase” and we expect many of those in-service dates are nearing.

The second trend is that the overall number of applications is generally declining as projects are canceled or downsized.  We attribute this at least in part to:

  • Unexpectedly high costs to interconnect revealed upon completion of the engineering study.
  • First-in-queue applicants moving forward claiming existing interconnection capacity leaving those projects next in line without a viable, economical path to completion.
  • Reasons unrelated to interconnection such as permitting authority disapproval, financing difficulties, easement challenges, etc.

Additionally, there have been 12 formal interconnection disputes filed by solar companies challenging Xcel’s methodology and/or study conclusions. In the dispute process, an independent engineer contracting with the state’s Department of Commerce reviews the complaint history and prepares a thorough report and recommended resolution. Most often the reports have then been appealed by one or both parties and escalated to the Commission for final decision. These disagreements have contributed to project delay, not only for the disputed projects but for others in the queue that have opted to be placed on hold in anticipation of a precedent-setting resolution.

The third trend is that new application volume has declined significantly since the deadline to submit co-located projects up to 5 MW lapsed in September 2015 as illustrated by the chart below. When the temporary 1 MW cap was reconsidered by the Commission in July 2016, it reached the same conclusion and the co-location cap of 1 MW remains going forward.


Lastly, a national policy milestone was reached when the Commission approved the Value of Solar (VOS) rate as the bill credit for Xcel’s solar garden program.  While Minnesota’s VOS methodology has been in place since 2014, this is the first time it will be put into practice in Minnesota and the country. All existing applications are grandfathered in under the Applicable Retail Rate (ARR) and new applications filed on or after January 1 2017 will receive the VOS rate. The small uptick of new application volume in the last few months as seen in the above chart is likely made up of projects developed with the ARR bill credit in mind submitting prior to the year-end deadline.

More work to be done

Engineering studies and designs are being completed, city and county permitting hurdles are being cleared, patient customers are signing up as subscribers to the program, and garden construction is underway across the state. Locally hired laborers and electricians have enjoyed a long building season as temperatures stayed mild through November. And because the extension of the federal tax credit took some pressure off of the firm end-of-2016 deadline, it is looking likely that we will have our first 100 MW of community solar energized within the first few months of 2017. Minnesota’s flagship CSG program with Xcel is still a national leader and is still poised to be the largest in the country – at least for the next year or two.

But it is critical that we continue the program momentum and stability to ensure the ongoing health and growth of the Minnesota solar market. To that end, Fresh Energy will be participating in three upcoming discussions:

  1. VOS plus an adjusted bill-credit rate

Between now and March 1, the Department of Commerce has been tasked with consideration of whether the Value of Solar (VOS) bill-credit rate should be adjusted with a positive or negative adder that could help to either encourage or discourage things like residential subscribers, low-income residential subscribers, brownfield sites, rooftop locations, etc. The Department of Commerce will file its recommendations with the Public Utilities Commission and stakeholders this spring.

2. Updating the state Interconnection Standards

Improvements to Xcel’s interconnection process have been made in the last two years or community solar applications, yet outdated state rules continue to be challenged by this large pipeline of projects and the technical engineering disputes that have arisen. The Commission and stakeholders recognize that the 12 year old interconnection rules are insufficient and Fresh Energy and our partners initiated a new docket to facilitate the adoption of national best practices for all projects moving forward.

3. Low-income garden access

The Commission’s last order requires Xcel to develop a community solar garden proposal specifically for low-income customers, applying Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) eligibility standards by March, 2017.

Avoiding the terrible 2s

The last two years have been, at times, a bit discouraging. But because of all the legwork and regulatory improvements, Xcel’s community solar program has unquestionably been a significant driver for investment and access in the state’s solar market. As the initial pioneering projects are commissioned the utility and developers will benefit from the hard-earned postmortem learnings that will result in accelerated timelines and lower project costs. Looking ahead to year 3, we’re optimistic that the program will find a more stable and healthy rhythm.


Comments are closed.